And walked past this...(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160603/2504a617312bfd1dbd5c88a0dbb06b99.jpg)
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160603/dfaba63e4c7b74b680ea4700d8d09177.jpg)
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160603/ba9c4d03d5331c6098d9e53c03c38f79.jpg)
Who thinks what?
Hot or not??
Looks good side on, pig fucking ugly from the front. As to what it's actually like as a bike, to ride and stuff, haven't got a fucking clue.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Horrible looking.
Apparently brilliant though.
Engine certainly is.
Like it
It'll have to be simply perfect to beat the S1R and considering Jap nakeds are always a bit blunt I bet it's second best.
What is the price difference though?
Quote from: Dom1 on June 04, 2016, 09:23:40 PM
What is the price difference though?
Under £2k and I'm willing to bet the Beemer is more than £2k better.
MY EYES!!!!!!!!!
(http://i393.photobucket.com/albums/pp11/gobert3/20160605_075743_zpswiuhnnm4.jpg)
If you want a good looking supernaked........
I genuinely believe there is no such thing on the whole.
Totally agree but there are levels of "less ugly"......
Quote from: Gobert on June 05, 2016, 10:20:17 AM
(http://i393.photobucket.com/albums/pp11/gobert3/20160605_075743_zpswiuhnnm4.jpg)
If you want a good looking supernaked........
Now that I like!
All great bikes...the best one is the one that is best for you...it's that simple...had a tiff with PB on Facebook as they stated cheaper than an S1000r...which it is...because it doesn't have the same level of technology and is definitely built to a budget...a walk around the Yamaha and it's very cheap and unfinished...my 2007 R1 was a class built bike...Yamaha with this bike in particular have reduced their quality drastically.
The MT10 is just trying a bit too hard. Some companies could carry off that kind of styling but I think Yamaha didnt quite make it work. I'm sure its mental to ride though.